I've said over and over we cannot accept or allow some w/o allowing all of them; legally and operationally on the ground it's not workable-all of the men have to stay out. And it's not women's burden to deal w/ these male lunatics who have created these problems for themselves. BTW, this troon is a masterful manipulator when in reality I've been told (and seen myself) that he is a nasty piece of work.
@9:31 That is key. These guys will gravel at the feet of gullible people like Puers Morgan in order to solidify their standing as "one if the sane ones." People like Piers are so used to getting hammered by far Lefties that this ego stroke is just what is needed for him to concede men like Wu and claim they deserve to be in the bathroom. Piers is do dumb that he can't see how old this trick is. Troons study, take notes and follow tricks like these in order to be one of the few to be let past the gate and into "Womanhood." It's all so pathetic to watch.
Camera filter working overtime on Flynt's face. I would not recommend googling his picture because he looks like a 2005-ish crackhead from San Fran (oddly specific but I'm feeling barbed this morning.)
The word 'ghoul' encompasses him in it's every definition: appearance, vocally, mentally, spiritually.
And his video games, atrocious. Nothing but cheap male wank off power fantasies where women look like porcelain bimbos.
yep shit ton of facial surgery, filler and Botox too. Mind you that's no different to half the women in the West these days. When I go into my office there is barely a woman under forty who doesn't have lips like a cod fish, eye lashes like two yard brushes, ridiculous plastic fingernails and a face totally incapable of expression. Never really understood the desire to look like a rubber sex doll!
The voice as unpleasant as usual. I couldn‘t listen to him for more than 5min. Too painful to my ears on top of the content of his words and then the name - like out of a porn production site - as usual as well!
I don't care pe true trans as long as they get TF out of women spaces, don't get an ID with female in it and we call them sir. Same with cross dressers, I see problematic to forbid them to women face because of freedom of expression, but if we all call them sir and everybody treat them just as a weirdo with a dress they would drop this shit immediately.
There is this British guy on YouTube that I used to watch sometimes until he got on my last nerve. He used to talk about trans issues and probably still does, and he seemed to be mostly on our side except for the fact that he kept claiming that the vast majority of them simply wanted to live their own lives and not cause any trouble. He kept claiming that it was only a loudly vocal minority that caused all the trouble and were cheating actual women out of our rights. I disagree with him, of course, and I tried a couple of times to explain to him that there are no good troons and that all of them violate women and girls. He never responded to me directly, but he still kept repeating his false claim that it was only a tiny minority of troons that cause issues for women and girls. I quit watching his videos as soon as I realized that he was never going to stop the lie he was promoting.
He has the ratio arse about face, there are a very small minority who want to live their lives and be left alone and are reciprical in that. The vast majority are transvestic fetishists and autogynephiles. That minority don't go on news programs, appear in documentaries, don't have active YouTube channels, podcasts or appear on other peoples podcasts. The don't hang around "The Community" or go on Pride Parades. In fact you would never know they are there.
Sorry that I can't remember his name or the name of his channel. All I can tell you is that he is British and his videos consist of him going for walks and talking using a selfie stick. The walks are all in natural scenery like parks or out in the countryside.
and oh hell yes has Brianna got some serious filters going on on that webcam ! Compare that to the Triggernometry interview where they controlled the camera.
Kinda think you should recognize the difference between saner transwomen -- compound word like "crayfish" which ain't -- like Wu and Hayton -- and those who are crazier than shithouse rats (most of them). For example, searching for Wu's tweets, I ran across this one:
Wu: "Attention trans activists. @piersmorgan and most people will stand with us if we stop insisting on nonsense like trans women in sports and ignoring biology."
"most people" is probably a stretch but some evidence to suggest that that "transwomen in sports" was a hot-button issue in the US elections, and a proximate cause for Harris and the Democrats going down in flames -- couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch as far as I'm concerned. But ICYMI, see Sam Harris on the point, on "The Reckoning":
The problem is generally not with the male transvestites who want to really get into playing the part of a woman by lopping off their dicks in favour of some neovaginas, but with those who insist that they have thereby actually changed sex and demand to be treated as if they had.
These 'resaonable' transwomen are Trojan horses, nothing more, nothing less. They are like the non-kiddy-fiddling pedophiles whose emergence into the public sphere is also a slippery slope leading to the eventual acceptance of pedophilia as a sexual orientation. Karen is spot on as usual.
There are no good troons. All of them are homophobic. All of them despise women. Paedophilia and other forms of degeneracy are ubiquitous amongst them. Just because one bloke has a slightly firmer grasp on reality than another doesn't change what he is
You mean the men who still go into women's spaces and call themselves "women" and change the sex markers on their driver's licenses to reflect "female?"
Didnt Wu also claim that if he went into the mens bathroom he would be immediately SAed and also threatened to kill himself if he doesnt get his way when it comes to hormone access, whats sane about that
Haven't the foggiest idea -- you have a citation or two for that? Though transwomen in general tend not to be very reliable or intellectually honest, but Wu DID say no transwomen in women's sports and at least genuflected towards biology.
Karen is correct: Wu is a complete Trojan horse with all of this "reasonable trans woman" stuff, particularly with the "Oh, no! We should definitely all stay out of women and girls sports!" stuff.
03 October 2024
"It’s sad, but don’t think sports are savable for a generation. We’re gonna have to revisit after we rebuild public trust.
This is literally triage. Save healthcare. Protect the legality of transition."
He is simply blowing smoke up the arse of anyone foolish enough to listen to him. For some reason, he thinks that he's gonna lose access to exogenous hormones and is trying to mitigate against it. Fair enough, one might suppose but he's as mad as a box of frogs imo.
Thanks. Though, as mentioned, having been banned from Twitter means that I have a very limited set of tweets -- of anyone -- that I can actually see. Clicking on Highlights, Articles, etc. simply gives me a Log In screen.
So not much context to any of Wu's tweets -- exactly what did "she" mean by "not savable"?
But this tweet of "hers" -- accessible because she pinned it -- kind of takes the cake and more or less proves "her" and most of her ilk to be barking mad:
Though that does hinge on what it takes to qualify as a "normal woman". But the standard definition is "adult human female" which means they won't EVER qualify as such, regardless of how much surgery they have and how many hormones they take -- pigs will fly sooner. Y'all might take a gander at that Speaking Plainly post I'd linked to above:
Of particular note is a tweet by India Willoughby:
Willoughby: "The only difference between trans women and most cis women is having babies and periods. That’s it. In all other ways, we biologically and factually change sex.": https://x.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/1558101840755056646
But that "having babies and periods" is the whole flaming ballgame -- the essential trait, the sine qua non of "female": produces large gametes. No ovaries, not a female. Do not pass Go; do not collect $200. Case closed -- with extreme prejudice.
It's the standard biological definitions -- for which there is massive amounts of scientific and biological evidence, and a great many philosophical justifications -- that unhorses the transloonie nutcases, their fellow-travelers, and various useful & useless idiots. Y'all might actually try taking a close look at them for a point of reference:
From the first of those links, the Journal of Molecular Human Reproduction:
"Female: Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems.
Male: Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes in anisogamous systems."
And also, see these popular and quite common definitions from the Oxford English Dictionaries -- Google/Oxford-Languages says pretty much the same thing:
"You might try reading..." says the guy who proceeded to strawman. Notice how my comment said nothing about his being for or against men in women's sports. It mentioned neither him or sports at all actually. So, I have no idea what you're talking about as it doesn't follow my comment...AT ALL.
Exactly they are all the same doesn’t matter if they claim to be one of the “good”ones or not. There are no good trans because trans doesn’t exist. Is it a mental illness. Bruce Jenner is mentally ill. He is not and will never be a woman.
I have absolutely no respect for Piers Morgan. He's a racist, Anti-Women piece of shit 💩
Has anyone else noticed:
Conservative men only fight against M2F Transformers for the right of Women's Sports.
WHY❓
Because Women's Sports have created revenue for States.
🔥It's rare that the Men ever fight against Transformers in Women's College Dorms, Prison, Public Restrooms, Gym Locker room s, Women's Homeless Shelters, Women's Domestic Violence Safe Houses including the Girl Scouts 💯
Janet Mock is a ridiculous man and so is this guy Flint. There are no decent troons, if there were they would accept that they are men with a mental illness and fetish and stay out and away from women’s spaces.
Pierce Morgan is crafty and mendacious just like the troons. This is just another pathetic example of men supporting men and getting what they want at the expense of women and girls.
Recognizing one trans woman is recognizing them all. They are all bad.
Exactly.
I've said over and over we cannot accept or allow some w/o allowing all of them; legally and operationally on the ground it's not workable-all of the men have to stay out. And it's not women's burden to deal w/ these male lunatics who have created these problems for themselves. BTW, this troon is a masterful manipulator when in reality I've been told (and seen myself) that he is a nasty piece of work.
A man in a frock is a man in a frock.
A man with no cock is a man with no cock.
@9:31 That is key. These guys will gravel at the feet of gullible people like Puers Morgan in order to solidify their standing as "one if the sane ones." People like Piers are so used to getting hammered by far Lefties that this ego stroke is just what is needed for him to concede men like Wu and claim they deserve to be in the bathroom. Piers is do dumb that he can't see how old this trick is. Troons study, take notes and follow tricks like these in order to be one of the few to be let past the gate and into "Womanhood." It's all so pathetic to watch.
This is why I love Karen. She tells it like it is.
Thanks!!
Camera filter working overtime on Flynt's face. I would not recommend googling his picture because he looks like a 2005-ish crackhead from San Fran (oddly specific but I'm feeling barbed this morning.)
The word 'ghoul' encompasses him in it's every definition: appearance, vocally, mentally, spiritually.
And his video games, atrocious. Nothing but cheap male wank off power fantasies where women look like porcelain bimbos.
They all look like some version of Gollum or Gollum's cousin.
yep shit ton of facial surgery, filler and Botox too. Mind you that's no different to half the women in the West these days. When I go into my office there is barely a woman under forty who doesn't have lips like a cod fish, eye lashes like two yard brushes, ridiculous plastic fingernails and a face totally incapable of expression. Never really understood the desire to look like a rubber sex doll!
Oh wow that explains the 'uncanny valley' appearance. I had no idea he went under the knife to repair that trainwreck he calls a face, what a creep!
OMG, even if one just keeps to the surgical/cosmetic procedures that he himself will cop to it's simply astonishing!
The voice as unpleasant as usual. I couldn‘t listen to him for more than 5min. Too painful to my ears on top of the content of his words and then the name - like out of a porn production site - as usual as well!
he has an oil slick voice, makes the spine shudder with disgust.
I don't care pe true trans as long as they get TF out of women spaces, don't get an ID with female in it and we call them sir. Same with cross dressers, I see problematic to forbid them to women face because of freedom of expression, but if we all call them sir and everybody treat them just as a weirdo with a dress they would drop this shit immediately.
There is this British guy on YouTube that I used to watch sometimes until he got on my last nerve. He used to talk about trans issues and probably still does, and he seemed to be mostly on our side except for the fact that he kept claiming that the vast majority of them simply wanted to live their own lives and not cause any trouble. He kept claiming that it was only a loudly vocal minority that caused all the trouble and were cheating actual women out of our rights. I disagree with him, of course, and I tried a couple of times to explain to him that there are no good troons and that all of them violate women and girls. He never responded to me directly, but he still kept repeating his false claim that it was only a tiny minority of troons that cause issues for women and girls. I quit watching his videos as soon as I realized that he was never going to stop the lie he was promoting.
He has the ratio arse about face, there are a very small minority who want to live their lives and be left alone and are reciprical in that. The vast majority are transvestic fetishists and autogynephiles. That minority don't go on news programs, appear in documentaries, don't have active YouTube channels, podcasts or appear on other peoples podcasts. The don't hang around "The Community" or go on Pride Parades. In fact you would never know they are there.
EXACTLY!
Which bloke was this? Oh, I know that there are more "ally" types than you can shake a stick at, but now I'm curious!
Sorry that I can't remember his name or the name of his channel. All I can tell you is that he is British and his videos consist of him going for walks and talking using a selfie stick. The walks are all in natural scenery like parks or out in the countryside.
Okay 👍🏻
Was it Disgruntled Danny?
and oh hell yes has Brianna got some serious filters going on on that webcam ! Compare that to the Triggernometry interview where they controlled the camera.
One of your best, Karen.
Kinda think you should recognize the difference between saner transwomen -- compound word like "crayfish" which ain't -- like Wu and Hayton -- and those who are crazier than shithouse rats (most of them). For example, searching for Wu's tweets, I ran across this one:
Wu: "Attention trans activists. @piersmorgan and most people will stand with us if we stop insisting on nonsense like trans women in sports and ignoring biology."
https://x.com/BriannaWu/status/1857007259517161932
"most people" is probably a stretch but some evidence to suggest that that "transwomen in sports" was a hot-button issue in the US elections, and a proximate cause for Harris and the Democrats going down in flames -- couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch as far as I'm concerned. But ICYMI, see Sam Harris on the point, on "The Reckoning":
https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning
Relative to that large cohort of crazies, you might have some interest in this post:
"Is it really true that 'no one's denying the reality of biological sex'? There seems to be a lot of people doing that thing that 'no one' is doing": https://speakingplainly.substack.com/p/is-it-really-true-that-no-ones-denying
The problem is generally not with the male transvestites who want to really get into playing the part of a woman by lopping off their dicks in favour of some neovaginas, but with those who insist that they have thereby actually changed sex and demand to be treated as if they had.
These 'resaonable' transwomen are Trojan horses, nothing more, nothing less. They are like the non-kiddy-fiddling pedophiles whose emergence into the public sphere is also a slippery slope leading to the eventual acceptance of pedophilia as a sexual orientation. Karen is spot on as usual.
So, it's "four legs good, two legs bad", amirite? Take an aspirin and you might as well start mainlining heroin? 🙄
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Farm
There are no good troons. All of them are homophobic. All of them despise women. Paedophilia and other forms of degeneracy are ubiquitous amongst them. Just because one bloke has a slightly firmer grasp on reality than another doesn't change what he is
You mean the men who still go into women's spaces and call themselves "women" and change the sex markers on their driver's licenses to reflect "female?"
You might try reading and thinking about my links. Wu is apparently quite dead set against the idea of transwomen in women's sports.
Didnt Wu also claim that if he went into the mens bathroom he would be immediately SAed and also threatened to kill himself if he doesnt get his way when it comes to hormone access, whats sane about that
Haven't the foggiest idea -- you have a citation or two for that? Though transwomen in general tend not to be very reliable or intellectually honest, but Wu DID say no transwomen in women's sports and at least genuflected towards biology.
Go look on his twitter
I've been banned from Twitter -- several times in fact. Even wrote an open letter to Jack Dorsey objecting to that:
https://medium.com/@steersmann/open-letter-to-twitters-board-of-directors-d1c87603a832
But that means I'm very limited in what I can see. You have anything in particular?
Karen is correct: Wu is a complete Trojan horse with all of this "reasonable trans woman" stuff, particularly with the "Oh, no! We should definitely all stay out of women and girls sports!" stuff.
03 October 2024
"It’s sad, but don’t think sports are savable for a generation. We’re gonna have to revisit after we rebuild public trust.
This is literally triage. Save healthcare. Protect the legality of transition."
He is simply blowing smoke up the arse of anyone foolish enough to listen to him. For some reason, he thinks that he's gonna lose access to exogenous hormones and is trying to mitigate against it. Fair enough, one might suppose but he's as mad as a box of frogs imo.
Maybe, though I don't see any justification for that argument in "her" Wikipedia bio:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brianna_Wu
You have a link for that "sports are [not] salvageable for a generation", supposedly from Wu?
I wouldn't get too carried away with Wu's sudden conversion to "the light"
See my comment on Karen's previous video!
https://x.com/BriannaWu/status/1841672431087259721?t=Jdp34xQ_ySS2CR8sT2UhDA&s=19
Thanks. Though, as mentioned, having been banned from Twitter means that I have a very limited set of tweets -- of anyone -- that I can actually see. Clicking on Highlights, Articles, etc. simply gives me a Log In screen.
So not much context to any of Wu's tweets -- exactly what did "she" mean by "not savable"?
But this tweet of "hers" -- accessible because she pinned it -- kind of takes the cake and more or less proves "her" and most of her ilk to be barking mad:
"... and me all transitioned to be normal women."
https://x.com/BriannaWu/status/1853445966751248544
Though that does hinge on what it takes to qualify as a "normal woman". But the standard definition is "adult human female" which means they won't EVER qualify as such, regardless of how much surgery they have and how many hormones they take -- pigs will fly sooner. Y'all might take a gander at that Speaking Plainly post I'd linked to above:
https://speakingplainly.substack.com/p/is-it-really-true-that-no-ones-denying
Of particular note is a tweet by India Willoughby:
Willoughby: "The only difference between trans women and most cis women is having babies and periods. That’s it. In all other ways, we biologically and factually change sex.": https://x.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/1558101840755056646
But that "having babies and periods" is the whole flaming ballgame -- the essential trait, the sine qua non of "female": produces large gametes. No ovaries, not a female. Do not pass Go; do not collect $200. Case closed -- with extreme prejudice.
It's the standard biological definitions -- for which there is massive amounts of scientific and biological evidence, and a great many philosophical justifications -- that unhorses the transloonie nutcases, their fellow-travelers, and various useful & useless idiots. Y'all might actually try taking a close look at them for a point of reference:
https://academic.oup.com/molehr/article/20/12/1161/1062990 (see the Glossary)
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3063-1
https://twitter.com/pwkilleen/status/1039879009407037441 (Oxford Dictionary of Biology)
From the first of those links, the Journal of Molecular Human Reproduction:
"Female: Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems.
Male: Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes in anisogamous systems."
And also, see these popular and quite common definitions from the Oxford English Dictionaries -- Google/Oxford-Languages says pretty much the same thing:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181020204521/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/female
https://web.archive.org/web/20190608135422/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/male
https://web.archive.org/web/20190326191905/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sex
"You might try reading..." says the guy who proceeded to strawman. Notice how my comment said nothing about his being for or against men in women's sports. It mentioned neither him or sports at all actually. So, I have no idea what you're talking about as it doesn't follow my comment...AT ALL.
Yup. Sounds totally "sane" to me, too. Lol
If Piers ever need help pulling those massive splinters out of his arse he'd better not call on me.
Wu is gay not AGP, married to a man Frank Wu hence the surname change.
Exactly they are all the same doesn’t matter if they claim to be one of the “good”ones or not. There are no good trans because trans doesn’t exist. Is it a mental illness. Bruce Jenner is mentally ill. He is not and will never be a woman.
I have absolutely no respect for Piers Morgan. He's a racist, Anti-Women piece of shit 💩
Has anyone else noticed:
Conservative men only fight against M2F Transformers for the right of Women's Sports.
WHY❓
Because Women's Sports have created revenue for States.
🔥It's rare that the Men ever fight against Transformers in Women's College Dorms, Prison, Public Restrooms, Gym Locker room s, Women's Homeless Shelters, Women's Domestic Violence Safe Houses including the Girl Scouts 💯
🔥🔥 Reasonable Demons 👿👿 on all fronts.
Don't trust any of them‼️💯
Janet Mock is a ridiculous man and so is this guy Flint. There are no decent troons, if there were they would accept that they are men with a mental illness and fetish and stay out and away from women’s spaces.
Pierce Morgan is crafty and mendacious just like the troons. This is just another pathetic example of men supporting men and getting what they want at the expense of women and girls.