44 Comments

Why does it feel to me as if the most unflattering frock of all time was the one selected for the event?

Could it possibly have been to add to the incredibly predictable media shit storm? You can't tell me that this guy doesn't just *adore* any and all forms of attention, even if it requires him to really ramp up the old misogyny and public declarations of support for child abuse. Perhaps someone should remind him of the demographics of his fan base, IDK...

Expand full comment

It looks like someone stitched a line of elastic through a satin table cloth and scrunched it around themselves.

Expand full comment

Yes, it does! While I don't personally find the thing at all attractive, it has been pointed out to me that it was designed to accommodate and accentuate the curves of the female form - so I do find myself wondering what it might look like on a woman.

I simply don't understand why a man would choose to wear something so unflattering out in public save to create a boatload of free press for some reason.

Expand full comment

Beyoncé Knowles could make a burlap sack look sexy but even she couldn't rescue that monstrosity!

Expand full comment

Doing that might actually end up being far more flattering!

Expand full comment

Christian Siriano makes some seriously ugly clothes

Expand full comment

Karen, have you seen the news about the postal worker murdered by a TIM who the msm insisted on calling a woman?🙄

Expand full comment

It’s certainly the behaviour of a violent man which is exactly what HE is.

Expand full comment
2dEdited

Literally all over a deli sandwich, too. Now, I love a sandwich myself, particularly if it was made by someone else. They're always more delicious somehow!

That said, I rather highly doubt that I'll ever feel even slightly tempted to stab someone in a frenzy over one. IDK, it couldn't possibly be because I'm not a violent man, could it? 🙄

Expand full comment

Males demonstrate their perversions in public with their clothing and they are a threat, and women do not.

That's why we can wear anything we want, and men cannot.

It's as simple as that.

Expand full comment

Mace and Degeners certainly didn't masturbate,or even consider doing so, or hoped anyone else would, at the sight of themselves in tuxedos.

Expand full comment

I don't; know, Mace looks pretty good to me

Expand full comment
2dEdited

LOL Point taken. She looks pretty good to me too, and I'm straight! Van Ness just looks like a circus clown...which denotes a big turn off to most folks, but there is coulrophilia, a clown fetish, so some sick twist somewhere is into him.

Expand full comment

Malene Dietrich broke the clothes binary long before our time.

Expand full comment

The same intersectionality that got the UK in terrible straits over the rape gangs is this crap, too. Intersectionality is a disease

Expand full comment
2dEdited

Intersectionality, inclusion, are generally just the new word for misogyny now. Amazing how in the left's current victim hierarchy, men and boys that are sex offenders often outrank their victims on the sympahty scale. Ana Kasparian said she left the Democratic party because she was sexually assaulted by a homeless man and people on the left called her out for talking about it because doing so demonizes homeless people. WTF?!

Expand full comment

They took the oppression hierarchy, turned it upside down and shook it...and now, we got problems and I don't think we can solve em

Expand full comment

He looks like a damn fool in his dress. The statement "fictitious women's fairness in sports" shows he's a damn fool whatever he's wearing. Nancy Mace's outfit wasn't affirmation of fealty to a cult. His dress and bullshit gaslighting clearly are.

Expand full comment

bro is not stunning

Expand full comment

Jonathan Van Ness just what the world needs another histrionic queen telling us all all about something he knows fuck all about!

Expand full comment

Yes, particularly in his zeal to sterilise other people's children!

So gross.

Expand full comment

He looks like a man in a garbage bag

Expand full comment

Karen, another quite topical news story is the fact that the trans identifying and axe wielding Australian Evie Amati has been let out of prison and granted parole after a mere eight years inside* for the attempted murder of three complete strangers.

I'm sure you could find something to say about that, too...

*inside the women's prison system, too

Expand full comment
2dEdited

I thnk Van Ness has referred to himself as "a feminine presenting non-binary trans person". Not that trans or non-binary make any sense, but putting the two together seems like a ontradiction. He has also called himself a victim of misogyny.

Billy Porter is the black man that wears dresses

Expand full comment

Nothing feminime or nonconforming about him.

Expand full comment

😆"like a sledgehammer to the head" I guffawed... on point as always Karen👊🏽

Expand full comment

He just doesn’t get his rocks off if he doesn’t look like a chimp in a dress. Thats his thrill, making a joke at women’s expenses. Glad he aint claiming to be gay at least.. we can categorise him as just a creep.

Expand full comment

He looks ridiculous. I cannot abide this waste man.

Expand full comment

Your sound card is fucked dear one...the software didn't fix it

Expand full comment

A woman wearing a tux is just a woman wearing a tux. A man wearing a dress is a man having a public wank.

Expand full comment

Here's the thing about males in dresses. For centuries males have mocked women by wearing feminine attire and even males played women roles in plays. As time went on, a male in a dress was mocked. Male writers for tv shows, movies, books, and even music videos used the gag of a guy in a dress as comedy. No one, especially other males took a guy serious in a dress. So if Johnny, is so upset with people making fun of him, he shouldn't look any further then Hollyweird who has perpetuated the male in a dress as funny for centuries! He take up his distain with male writers who made this an absolute joke for years and society has accepted it as well. Beside all that, women have dressed in masculine attire for centuries as a means of comfortable and the ability to complete every day tasks, which made the task more manageable then wearing a dress or a skirt. Society accepted women wearing pants and eventually more masculine attire as a part of our wardrobe. We didn't wear masculine attire to get sexually aroused. Even butch lesbians who get ridiculed for wearing masculine attire aren't accused of wearing male clothing, because we get off on it. Actually we are constantly harassed by male society, that we want to be males. However, males wearing female attire was either to ridicule women or it was about having a sexual fetish. Guys became sexually aroused in dresses, skirts, and women's underwear. Males wearing women attire was never meant for comfort or accomplishing every day tasks like it was for women. It was always an insidious reason why they paraded around in female attire.

Expand full comment

Sadly Stella O'Malley (of Genspect fame) has made some pretty bold and ill-advised comments about her belief that lesbian "cross-dressing" is a paraphilia.

I don't think that the backlash recieved even made her consider walking her ignorant homophobia back, but here we are...

Expand full comment

I think Stella is a closeted homosexual. She hates on women too much.

Expand full comment

It's sick that trans-revisionism insists that any woman who used to wear "male" clothing was oBvIoUsLy a non-woman. The ideology is so depraved it can't comprehend anything except from the point of view of male fetishes

Expand full comment

They are so desperate to connect women wearing male attire to the pretender delusion, because they know males are like that. So they are so hard pressed to find the same with women, but they can't, because women aren't like that.

Expand full comment